Wednesday, 31 December 2025

AI Visual Hallucinations: Why Image Models Struggle with Charts & Data

Understanding AI isn't just about knowing tools — it's about developing a thinking discipline.This article demonstrates it. 

Read my book 📘 AI for the Rest of Us to build this discipline systematically, or reach out to me for group training sessions where we explore these nuances together in real time.

Whether through the book or in-group conversations, learn how to distinguish AI's reasoning capabilities from its perceptual limitations — the difference that separates intuition from insight.


Download this article as a PDF — perfect for offline reading or sharing with friends on social media!


What 2025 Quietly Taught Me About AI (And Why It Matters in 2026)

Some lessons you only learn by actually using AI — not watching demos.

As 2026 begins, I found myself reflecting on something unexpected. It wasn't the speed of AI, the hype, or even the sheer number of tools released. Instead, it was the small, practical lessons that only surface when you work hands-on with the technology — especially when you try to do something very simple and very real.

In my case, it started with a New Year visual.

A Simple Task That Revealed a Bigger Truth

All I wanted was a simple visual: a pie chart showing how people used Chat GPT in 2025, inspired by recent articles and reports on real‑world usage. I had just four clear data points with neat percentages – nothing complicated at all.

Yet, no matter which advanced image model I used — and I tried several — something strange kept happening. The pie chart kept coming out wrong. Sometimes it had five slices instead of four; sometimes the values repeated or the labels drifted. Most often, the proportions simply didn’t make mathematical sense.

Figure 1: How People Used ChatGPT in 2025 (AI‑Generated Draft With Duplicated “21%”) – This pie chart was created by an image model, which visually repeated the 21% “search / information” slice twice, revealing how AI‑generated visuals can look polished yet still contain hidden numerical errors.




AI image tools are not as intelligent as LLMs — they create visuals, not understanding

🧠 Technical Insight: Why Visual AI Struggles with Math

While Large Language Models (LLMs) are built to predict the next logical token in a sequence—often involving "reasoning" steps—Image Generation engines use a process called Diffusion.

They work by denoising a cloud of pixels to match a visual pattern. When you ask for a chart, the AI isn't doing math; it's simply trying to recreate the aesthetic of a chart it saw in its training data. To a visual AI, a "pie chart" is just a shape, not a mathematical ratio.

The Important Realization

AI image models don’t actually understand charts. They don’t understand numbers, proportions, scales, or the relationships between values. They generate images based on visual patterns they’ve seen before — not on logic or data integrity.

When you ask an image model to “draw a pie chart,” it doesn’t calculate anything. It simply produces something that looks like a pie chart. This is why:

  • Four slices become five.

  • Values repeat or contradict each other.

  • Proportions look aesthetically pleasing but remain inaccurate.

  • Text appears in nonsensical places.

Where I Finally Got It Right

The breakthrough came when I stopped asking image models to do data work. Instead, I used Perplexity AI, which leverages Python-based computation for charts. That made all the difference.

Because when numbers matter, a code-based approach:

  1. Calculates accurately.

  2. Respects scale.

  3. Place labels correctly.

  4. Doesn’t “guess” visually.

The chart was perfect in a single attempt. That’s when the lesson really landed for me.

Figure 2: How People Used ChatGPT in 2025 (Code‑Generated Chart From Perplexity LLM Tool) – This pie chart was created by a language‑model‑powered assistant that wrote Python code and rendered the visual from actual data, giving a far more accurate representation than the image model while still lacking the greeting‑card style polish of purely visual AI.


The Real Lesson: Use the Right Tool for the Job

AI today is incredibly powerful — but only when used correctly. Here’s what I learned the hard way:

Image models are excellent for design, mood, and presentation, but they are not meant for numerical accuracy. Language models are great for brainstorming and structure, while data tools (Python, Excel, BI tools) remain essential for truth and precision.

When we mix these wisely, AI becomes a superpower. When we expect one tool to do everything, frustration follows.

A Thought for 2026

As we step into the new year, this is the mindset I’m carrying forward: AI is not here to replace thinking; it’s here to support it.

While working through these experiments, one thought stayed with me.

We spent centuries warming the planet — often without realizing the long-term impact.

Today, AI seems to be warming the internet much faster.

Not because it’s harmful, but because it’s being used without enough thought.

When speed replaces understanding, noise grows faster than insight.

Perhaps the real skill in 2026 is not using more AI —

but using it more deliberately.

The real skill in 2026 won’t be just learning new tools. It will be knowing which tool to trust — and when not to. Sometimes, the smartest thing we can do with AI is to let it assist, and then apply human judgment to the result.

Let’s use AI wisely — not blindly.


Wishing you a thoughtful, grounded, and meaningful 2026.


⚡ A Paradox Worth Noting: The Unreliability of Accuracy

This cover image itself was generated by visual AI—and it rendered mathematically accurate proportions (equal 25% quarters). Yet this accuracy was accidental, not deliberate. Why? Because visual AI models don't understand percentages or mathematics. They simply recreate visual patterns from their training data. Equal quarters appear often in charts and graphics, so the model successfully matched this common pattern.

When prompted again with the same request, the image model produced different errors—proving that visual AI has no consistent logic. It succeeded once by pattern-matching luck, not by reasoning. This is precisely the paradox: visual AI can appear accurate while being fundamentally unreliable.


Download this article as a PDF — perfect for offline reading or sharing with friends on social media!


Connect with Kannan M

LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook for more insights on AI, business, and the fascinating intersection of technology and human wisdom. Follow my blog for regular updates on practical AI applications and the occasional three-legged rabbit story.

For "Unbiased Quality Advice" call | Message me via blog

▶️ YouTube: Subscribe to our channel 

Blog - https://radhaconsultancy.blogspot.com/


#AIHallucination #AILiteracy #ThinkingDiscipline #AIVerification #DataIntegrity #AIReliability #AIForBusiness #AI


Thursday, 25 December 2025

Navigator AI Working Style: Lessons from a Top 5% ChatGPT User on Clear Thinking and Better Results

 AI rated me as a Navigator — Top 5% usage.

Not as an achievement, but as evidence of a thinking discipline.

This article explains it. My book helps you practice it.

📘 AI for the Rest of Us


Download this article as a PDF — perfect for offline reading or sharing with friends on social media!


Why ChatGPT Calls Me a 'Navigator' 

Your Guide to the Most Effective AI Working Style

ChatGPT’s 2025 review tagged my AI usage as “Navigator.” Here’s what that actually means, how it was earned, and how anyone can use this thinking style to get better results from AI.

When ChatGPT released its 2025 usage review, one label stood out for me: Archetype — Navigator.

At first glance, it may look like a badge or a fun summary. But when I reflected on why this label emerged, it revealed something deeper — not about prompts, tools, or tricks, but about how I think with AI.

This post is not about credit. It is about a working style that consistently produces better outcomes, and why AI naturally amplifies it. By adopting this 'Navigator' mindset, you can unlock far superior results from your own AI tools.

What Does “Navigator” Actually Mean?

A Navigator does not use AI randomly.
They don’t ask one question, accept the first answer, and move on.

Instead, they:

  • Plan before acting

  • Structure vague ideas into clear frameworks

  • Iterate until clarity emerges

  • Use AI as a thinking partner, not a shortcut

This label didn’t come from a single conversation. It emerged from patterns across hundreds of interactions.

Why I Got This Label (Practically, Not Philosophically)

Four habits shaped this outcome:

1. Multiple Iterations, Not One-Shot Answers
Most users stop after one or two responses.
I rarely do.

I refine prompts, challenge assumptions, ask for alternatives, and push for better structure — until the output matches what I actually need.


2. I Don’t Accept Vague or “Crab-Like” Answers
If something feels fuzzy, generic, or half-baked, I don’t move on.
I pause, question it, and force clarity.

AI rewards this behaviour. It sharpens with pressure.


3. I Spend More Time — But Get Better Output
Yes, this style takes more time upfront.
But it saves enormous effort later.

Whether it’s a presentation, training module, or analysis, the final output is cleaner, clearer, and easier to execute.


4. Cross-Verification to Reduce Hallucination
I deliberately use:

  • Different prompts

  • Different tools

  • Different framing styles


Then I compare the results.

This reduces blind trust and increases confidence in what finally gets used.

Why This Style Matters for Everyone

AI makes it easier to ask questions we hesitate to ask people:

  1. “Is this idea weak?”

  2. “Will this slide engage?”

  3. “Is my logic flawed?”

You can:

  • Ask AI to review your presentation

  • Predict engagement levels

  • Compare expectations with real outcomes

  • Even explore profound questions — ethics, purpose, belief — without judgement

Over time, AI becomes a thinking mirror.

That is exactly what happened in my case — and why the system reflected back “Planner” and “Navigator.”

The Real Takeaway

AI doesn’t reward clever prompts.
It rewards clear thinking, patience, and structured curiosity.

If you treat AI as a demo tool, you’ll get surface-level output.
If you treat it as a thinking partner, it will grow with you.

That’s not a theory.
That’s behaviour — observed, reflected, and now visible in data.

Try this style.
You may find your own “thinking buddy” sooner than you expect.

What is your AI Archetype? Share your experience in the comments below!


Download this article as a PDF — perfect for offline reading or sharing with friends on social media!


Connect with Kannan M

LinkedIn, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook for more insights on AI, business, and the fascinating intersection of technology and human wisdom. Follow my blog for regular updates on practical AI applications and the occasional three-legged rabbit story.

For "Unbiased Quality Advice" call Message me via blog

▶️ YouTube: Subscribe to our channel 

Blog - https://radhaconsultancy.blogspot.com/


#NavigatorMindset | #AICoaching | #ChatGPTTips | #FutureofWork | #AIforBusiness


Thursday, 11 December 2025

Predict Presentation Engagement with AI + Finance Workflows (D-Mart & Reconciliation)

Predict Presentation Engagement With AI + Bonus Workflows AI Blog Cover

Predict Presentation Engagement With AI + Bonus Workflows (D‑Mart & Reconciliation)

Bonus Pack: Tools, Prompts, PDFs & Proven AI Workflows

Key Takeaways From MMA — And What You Can Apply Today


I recently conducted an AI for Finance programme, and the response encouraged me to document the most practical parts of the session — along with several bonus insights that were delivered live due to popular demand. This blog brings everything together in one place for wider benefit.


1. A New Idea: Predicting Slide Engagement With AI

Before the session, I tested a new idea: asking AI to predict audience engagement for every slide. The model forecasted which sections would attract high attention, where participants might drift, and which demos would spark interest. This resulted in a slide‑by‑slide engagement map — a new way to refine presentations.

This method adds value at two stages:

Before the session: You can refine flow, structure, pacing, and clarity — or simply wait and watch how closely AI predictions match reality.

After the session: Predictions can be compared with quiz scores, feedback, time‑spent analytics, and actual participation patterns.

The overall alignment reached nearly 80% accuracy, showing how AI can identify blind spots and improve teaching, training, and communication workflows across industries.


2. How Will Quick‑Commerce Impact D‑Mart? (Live Demo)

During the programme, participants showed strong interest in a live demonstration exploring whether quick‑commerce growth could disrupt traditional brick‑and‑mortar stores like D‑Mart. This sparked valuable discussions and became one of the most appreciated parts of the session.

You can explore the extended versions using two methods:

You can read both analysis methods here:

NotebookLM Version Perplexity Version

This demonstration highlighted how AI compresses hours of research into minutes, helps evaluate behaviour shifts, explores business risks, and identifies new opportunities — applicable not only in finance, but also strategy, operations, supply chain, marketing, and leadership decision‑making.


3. Download: AI‑Enabled Bank Reconciliation Workflow

Reconciliation is repetitive and error‑prone. This downloadable workflow simplifies vendor cleanup, mismatch detection, duplicate identification, and structured prompting for automation.

📄 Download Reconciliation Workflow (PDF)


4. What Participants Said

“Very good trainer. Immense knowledge.”
“Strong practical clarity — real examples helped a lot.”
“NotebookLM explanation was new and useful.”
“AR ageing, Reconciliation and Trends were eye‑opening.”


5. Main Resources From the AI for Finance Session

Bonus Guide: AI + Excel (Free Resource)
AI + Excel Practical Guide (PDF)

Prompting & Deep Research Cheat Sheets
Cheat Sheets (Download)

AI for Finance Presentation:
Gamma Interactive Deck


6. Previous Sessions & Reference Material

Asan Engineering College – Academic Master Copy

Annamalai University – Part 1 (Engineering Faculty)

Annamalai University – Part 2 (Engineering Faculty)

For more AI content and updates, visit:
Radha Consultancy Blog


7. Books by Kannan

AI for the Rest of Us:
Buy on Google Play

Demystifying SIP for Financial Freedom:
Buy on Amazon


Connect With Me